The Harvard system of
referencing is a method for citing references in your assignments and giving
the sources of those references.
Referencing is a way of
crediting all sources of information and ideas that you have used in any
piece of academic work.
In your assignment, you
will use ideas and information from other sources to support points and
arguments you want to make. If you use someone else’s ideas in your work,
either by using your own words or making a direct quotation, you must
reference the source, in order to:
- acknowledge other people’s ideas
- show you are aware of other
people’s ideas and are including them
- allow the reader to find the
original material you have used.
You must reference whenever
you copy (diagrams, illustrations, tables) or directly quote from someone’s
work. You must also reference when you summarise ideas and information from
someone’s work, or when you paraphrase by putting someone else’s ideas in
your own words. Failure to do any of the above is considered plagiarism.
The Student Handbook at
Queen Margaret University College (2005) defines plagiarism as, “The
presentation by an individual of another person’s ideas or work (in any
medium, published or unpublished) as though they were his or her own “(qmu
2005, p.49). Plagiarism is considered to be a major breach of academic
regulations. If you are unsure about how to reference, and fail to
reference correctly in an assignment, it will still be regarded as
plagiarism, even though you did not set out with the intention of
plagiarising. For detailed information on plagiarism, and how to avoid it,
see the qmu website at:
http://www.qmu.ac.uk/goodscholarship/
There are two key aspects
to the Harvard system of referencing:
You cite a reference when you refer in your text, or the body of your
assignment, to any use you have made of the work of others.
- creating a reference list
A reference list is an alphabetical list by author, which you provide at the
end of your work. It must contain full details of all the sources you have
cited in your text. If you cite something in the text and do not include it
in the reference list this is considered to be plagiarism. It is important
that the references you cite within your writing link accurately to the
reference list at the end of your work, via the name of the author.
The reference list only
identifies sources referred to (cited) in the text of your assignment. You
may be required to provide a bibliography. A bibliography is presented in
the same format as a reference list but it also includes all
materials consulted in the preparation of your assignment. In other words, a
bibliography presents the same items as a reference list but it also
includes all other sources which you read or consulted but did not cite.
Please note that within qmu
certain subject areas do not adhere to the Harvard system of
referencing. You should always check the Academic Handbook
for your subject, or ask your tutors exactly which style of
referencing they would like you to follow for your
assignments.
|
In the Harvard system every
time you refer to a particular document or writer in your text you must
insert the author’s surname and the year of publication. This is known as
citing a reference and the same author/date principle applies to all
citations including books, journal articles, films or websites in the text.
All examples of
citations provided within this section are presented as complete references
on page 29.
Citations can be fitted
into the text in a variety of ways, as illustrated below:
2.1.1
You make a statement in your own
words, and give a reference for the source of ideas or the support for your
argument. If the author’s name appears naturally in the text you can omit it
from the brackets:
Specific measurements taken by
Smith and Brown (1999) show that there is a direct
correlation between diet and height.
|
2.1.2
If the author’s name is not
referred to in the text then you include it in the brackets:
The description of Baker Days
(Jones 2001) includes some cynical observations.
|
2.1.3
In the next example the ‘author’
is the name of the series while the ‘publisher’ would be Granada TV:
A recent television programme
discussed the important role of food in religion (World in
Action 2000).
|
2.1.4
If you want to cite several
references together to support a point that you make, they should be
arranged in the text in chronological order, with the oldest first:
Reflective practice is
considered an essential element within the caring
professions (Palmer 1994; Brown 1996; Davidson and Marsh
1999).
|
or:
Palmer (1994), Brown (1996) and
Davidson and Marsh (1999) all argue that reflective practice
is considered an essential element within the caring
professions.
|
2.1.5
If you need to refer to two or
more items by the same author in the same year, use lowercase letters to
show the difference:
Recent research in Edinburgh
confirms that boys are still more likely to commit serious
delinquent acts than girls (Smith 2004a). In his research at
Edinburgh University, David Smith (2004b) also asserts that
‘styles of parenting’ are closely related to crime and
antisocial behaviour, although being the victim of assault
or harassment remains one of the strongest predictors of
delinquency (Smith and McAra 2004).
|
2.2 Direct quotations
In the following two examples, you are giving a
direct quotation so you must also include the page number.
Haralambos and Holborn (1990,
p.143) state that “the family has been seen as a universal
social institution, an inevitable part of human society.”
|
Thinking and reflecting play an
important role in the learning process. “These resting times
provide periods for reflection and permit time for new
things to be learned, mastered and brought to fruition”
(Jones 1995, pp.122-3).
|
Note:
- you
do not use italics or bold typeface to indicate a quotation
- the
citation in brackets is part of the whole quotation. Therefore, the full
stop comes after the brackets and NOT at the end of the quotation. This
allows short quotations to blend into your work and the text to flow
naturally.
- long
quotations of 40 words or more must be indented from the left margin to
make the quotation clear
-
indent from the left margin by 1.27cm
- left
indentation shows that it is a quotation so it does not require
quotation marks, italics or bold typeface
- the
lead-in statement ends with a colon (see below)
-
separate the quotation from the lead-in sentence with one blank line
- note
when you use a long quotation, the full stop is placed after the last
sentence of the quotation and before the author date citation, as shown
below:
Singh states that there
is:
. . . a good deal of evidence that high-quality, cognitively enriched
day care has beneficial effects in many children’s overall cognitive
development. It has an equally powerful impact on the
development of the child’s social and communication skills. This
effect is particularly vivid for infants and children from poor
families. (Singh 1998, p.150)
Page numbers must be used within the text when
using a direct quotation or when referring to tables, illustrations or
figures. If such detail is required, i.e., page numbers, or track numbers of
sound recordings, these appear after the date within the brackets. The
abbreviations are:
- page
(p.) table (tab.)
- pages
(pp.) diagram (diagr.)
-
section (s.) figure (fig.)
-
sections (ss.) illustration (illus.)
- track
(tr.) volume (vol.).
In this example, you are referring to a specific
track on a CD:
On the song ‘Madame George’ from
the album ‘Astral Weeks’ (Morrison 1968, tr.6) the use of
poetic phrasing and the repetition and stretching of sounds,
words and phrases, has more emotional impact than the words
alone.
|
If a cited work has four or more authors, state
the first author listed, followed by ‘et al.’ in your text:
If there are fewer than
four authors then you must cite them all in your text.
(Bell, Dee and Peacock 2006)
In your reference list you should always include all authors regardless of
the number.
Jenkins, C., Beasley, S., Bell,
V. and Chapman, A. 2005. Punctuate but don’t deviate.
London: Saga.
|
Citing a website in the
text follows the same principle as for books. Whatever makes up the first
two elements of the full reference, which you have included in your
reference list, is what you will be referring to within the text of your
work:
The BBC web pages (BBC 2006)
contain a range of support materials which aim to improve
basic skills.
|
This would appear in the
reference list as:
BBC. 2006. Skillswise.
[online] Available from: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/skillswise/>
[Accessed April 10 2006].
|
A further example is:
The use of children in imagery
has always been a tactic for universal appeal. This has
extended beyond cards and posters to the use of online
imagery (Boy with spiky hair 2005).
|
This would appear in the
reference list as:
Boy with spiky hair sitting
in a bathtub. 2005. [online image] Available from:
<http://www.inmagine.com/all-kids,-all-fun-photos/photodisc-pvdv205>
pdv205.jpg [Accessed July 15 2005].
|
Note the sequence of month
day and year.
You apply the same formula
to a performance as you would to a book, a journal or a film. The two key
elements of the Harvard System are cited in the text and lead to the fuller
details within your reference list (see page 29):
Watching a contemporary
performance of Swan Lake (Nureyev 1999) in Paris inspired
the unlikely creation of a comedic performance at the
Edinburgh Festival six years later.
|
You cite electronic books
in exactly the same way you would a book or a journal:
According to Robin Birn, forward
planning, gathering evidence and building a picture of
customer behaviour is the key to success in business (Birn
2004).
|
Some databases, such as
ebrary, offer a citation service allowing you to download the full
bibliographic details of an item. This is not the Harvard System of
Referencing. You can use the details provided to construct a Harvard
reference which should be as follows:
Birn, R. 2004. The effective
use of market research: how to drive and focus better
business decisions. [electronic book] London: Kogan
Page. Available from: <http://site.ebrary.com/lib/qmu/>
[Accessed January 7 2006].
|
An ‘In’ reference is used when you are referring
to a piece of work which is contained within another publication. For
example:
- a
chapter in a volume of collected writings, brought together by an editor
- a
conference paper in a collection of papers presented at a conference and
gathered together in one volume with an editor as the main author.
In the text of your work you would cite the
author of the paper/chapter as usual:
Kozinets (1998) coined the term
‘netnography’ to describe a methodology he employed to
analyse consumer online communications.
|
You will always reference at least two names and possibly two dates in the
reference list:
Kozinets, R.V. 1998. On
netnography. Initial reflections on consumer investigations
of cyberculture. In: Bumbag, Z. ed. Research
methodologies and walking on the wild side. Bolton:
Widget Press, pp.22-32.
|
On some occasions, the author/editor may be the same person but you would
still follow the same format.
Once the work has been fully referenced in the
reference list your reader will be able to see where to find the original
work and who the editor is. Note that you must also include the page numbers
of the relevant chapter or section of the book in the reference list.
Works that you have not
read are known as secondary references. If, at all possible, you should read
the original work yourself. However, due to lack of availability you may
need to use a secondary reference:
In an article of 1991 Wilford
also maintains that Columbus’ treatment of native people
following his conquests is frequently seen in an ambiguous
light (cited in Ransby 1992, p.81).
|
Please note:
- only include works in your
reference list that you have actually read
- use ‘cited in’ to show that you
have not seen the original article by Wilford but only what Ransby says
about it
- Wilford must not appear in your
reference list
- you must include details of the
work by Ransby and the page numbers which refer to the ideas of Wilford.
The full reference appears as follows:
Ransby, B. 1992. Columbus and
the making of historical myth. Race and Class, 33 (3)
Jan-Mar pp.79-86.
|
Personal conversations or
interviews are not normally included in the reference list but these may be
cited in the text. Personal conversations and interviews should only be
included in the reference list where they have been recorded and/or
transcribed and are available in the public domain, for example, in a
library or on a website. The purpose of the reference list is to guide
future researchers to original material. If there is no record of the
personal conversation or interview, it does not appear in the reference
list:
In a telephone conversation on March 7 2006,
the Director of Age Concern, Peter Paul, reported that ageism continued
to impact on the employment potential of elders.
There would be no entry in
the Reference List for Paul 2006.
2.12 Understanding the link between your citation
and your reference list
The citation within your text is always made up
of the first two elements of the full reference, which appears in your
reference list, at the end of your work. i.e. author surname and year, in
brackets. Readers of your work can link straight from one (the citation in
the text) to the other (alphabetical reference list) with ease and speed. It
is therefore important that you guide them to the right author. Don’t
confuse the editor of a publication with the contributor to the publication
(see also 2.9 and 3.4).
A reference list and/or
bibliography must be included at the end of your assignment. A reference
list and bibliography are both alphabetical lists, organised by the surname
(family name) of the author, and include all of the sources you have used
for your research. Only those works you have cited in your text should
appear in the reference list.
The first two elements of
each reference in your bibliography or reference list (author and date)
appear in the text of your work. The reader of your work can easily check
the citation in your text with the bibliography or reference list at the
end, in order to find the full reference. Correct and consistent punctuation
is important, for example:
- the first word in the title of
books, chapters and journal articles starts with a capital letter
- authors’ names and initials,
journal titles, publishers’ names and places should also start with a
capital letter.
Note carefully how the examples below are
punctuated.
Details required for a book
can be found on the front and reverse of the title page which is usually the
first or second unnumbered page inside the book. Details for a book should
be set out in the following order and with the punctuation as indicated:
Author/Editor surname, Initial(s).
Year.
Title of the book. (in italics)
edition. (if later than the first and abbreviated to ed.)
Series and individual volume number. (if available)
Place of publication:
Name of publisher.
Smith, D. J. 2004. Parenting
and delinquency at ages 12 to 15. 2nd ed.
Edinburgh University: Centre for Law and Society.
|
Ramble, J. ed. 2006. Using
simple hygiene rules to combat MRSA. Health Education
Series, 42. Bristol: Magpie Publishing.
|
Please note:
- only give details of the edition if
it is later than the first. No edition statement means that it is the
first edition
- use the abbreviation ‘ed.’ for both
edition and editor
- use ‘eds.’ for more than one editor
- make sure the edition detail
matches the year of publication. For example, a book might be published
originally in 1994 but a second edition is published in 2004. In this
case, you put the year of publication as 2004 and state it is the second
edition. See the example of Smith, D. J. above
- when referring to the number of the
edition use 2nd or 3rd etc
- a reprint is not a new edition and
so the year of publication is the date of the last edition.
Details for a journal
article can usually be found on the contents list, front cover or article
itself. Details for a journal article should be set out in the following
order and with punctuation exactly as given:
Author/Editor surname, Initial(s).
Year.
Title of article.
Name of journal, (in italics)
Volume (part number) Month or Season (if available),
page number(s) of article.
Bonen, A. and Shaw, S. M. 1996.
Recreational exercise participation and aerobic fitness in
men and women: analysis of data from a national survey.
Journal of Sports Science, 13 (4) August, pp.297-303.
|
McCord, S., Fredriksen, L. and
Campbell, N. 2002. An accessibility assessment of selected
Web-based health information resources. Library Hi Tech,
20 (2) pp.188-198.
|
Details for referencing a
newspaper:
Author.
Year of publication.
Title of article.
Title of newspaper, (in italics)
Date of newspaper,
page number(s).
Rodney, Z. 2005. Edinburgh leads
the way in festival management. The Guardian,
November 19, p.5.
|
A common mistake is to
confuse the name of a contributor to a book of collected writings with that
of the editor. It is important to include the editor of the book in the
reference list as this is the information needed by anyone wanting to find
that piece of work (see also: section 2.9). If you have referred to or used
a specific chapter, you need to give details for that chapter:
Author of the chapter or the section (as cited in your text).
Year of publication.
Title of chapter or section.
(The word) In: Author/editor of the collected work.
Title of the collected work. (in italics)
Place of publication:
Publisher,
page numbers of the section or the chapter referred to.
Porter, M. 1998. What is
strategy? In: Segal-Horn, S. ed. The Strategy Reader.
Oxford: Blackwell in association with the Open University,
pp.73-99.
|
Your reference should start
with the name of the presenter of the lecture. If not available then you
begin with the conference name:
Presenter.
Year of presentation.
Conference/Event Name. (if available)
Title of presentation/lecture. (in italics)
Type of presentation, eg, [lecture], [workshop], [keynote address]
Date of presentation/lecture.
Location: Venue. (if available)
Roland, J. and Robson, J. 2005.
The Edinburgh Lectures. The health and psyche of the
Scottish nation. January 21. Edinburgh: The Royal
Society of Edinburgh.
|
Tan, A. 2006. The lost art of
sensitive criticism. April 1. [lecture] Edinburgh: Queen
Margaret University College.
|
Conference/event organisers/organisation.
Year of conference.
Title of conference. (in italics)
Date of conference.
Location: Venue. (if available)
CoFHE & UC&R Conference. 2006.
Lead, develop, change: future-proofing your skills.
July 3 – 6. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
|
Your reference should start with the author or
editor of the conference proceedings. If these are not available then you
begin with the conference name. Where possible you should also include the
place and the date of the conference:
Author/Editor.
Year of publication.
Conference Name. (in italics if no other title)
Number (if available)
Date of conference,
Location of conference. (if available)
Title of published work, if different from conference name. (In italics)
Place of publication:
Publisher.
Peacock, S. ed. 2005.
Proceedings of the JISC Conference on the legal aspects of
online learning environments. June 1 – 2, University of
Warwick. London: Routledge.
|
Include the following
information for Conference Papers:
Author/Editor of Conference paper.
Year of publication.
Title of conference paper.
(The word) In:
Author/Editor of conference proceedings. (if available)
Title of conference proceedings (in italics)
Date of conference,
Location of conference. (if available)
Place of publication:
Publisher,
page numbers of paper.
Huxham, M. 2005. Learning in
lectures: do ‘interactive windows’ help? In: Shakya,
G. ed. JISC Conference on Learning Online, August 6 –
9, 2004, Liverpool University. London: Open University,
pp.25-28.
|
Include the following information:
Author.
Year.
Title of thesis. (in italics)
Title of award,
Name of awarding institution.
Kelly, T. 1981. The
Irish-Catholic immigrant, 1890-1930. Ph.D. thesis,
Harvard University.
|
Lippes, R. 2005. Food as
emotional balm in the twentieth century: a study on cultural
change. MPhil thesis, Oxford Brookes University.
|
The author of most official
government publications will be a government department, body or committee.
Department of Health. 1999.
Saving lives: our healthier nation.
London: Stationery Office.
|
A report may be well known by the
name of the chairperson of the group or committee but they are not usually
referenced by the name of the author. In the text, you could refer to the
chairperson of the group or committee:
It was the Dearing Report (NCIHE
1997) which first placed the student at the heart of the
learning process.
|
In your reference list the full government report would be referenced as:
NCIHE. 1997. Higher education
in the learning society. Report of the National
Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education: The Dearing
Report. London: HMSO.
|
With an Act of Parliament, it is usual to cite
the title of the Act in your text, with the date, and then include it in
your reference list in alphabetical order of the first main word of the Act:
Disability Discrimination Act
1995. London:
HMSO.
|
The golden rule is always
to describe items as fully and clearly as possible, and in a consistent
format. In the case of TV/radio programmes, note the date and channel of
transmission. The format of the item should always be provided. Include the
following information:
Series Title.
Series number. (if
appropriate)
Year of production.
Programme title. (in
italics)
Place of publication:
Transmitting organisation,
Date of transmission
medium: format [in square
brackets].
For all materials cited from a transmission rather than a hard copy, the
date of transmission and the transmitting organisation should be given, if
no other unique identifier of the particular edition is available:
The Culture Show. 2006.
London: BBC 2, April 6.
|
Barenboim, D. 2006. Reith
lectures: in the beginning was sound. London: BBC Radio
4, April 7 – May 5.
|
The Apprentice. Series 1. 2005.
Tim in the firing line. London: BBC 2, November 23
[DVD].
|
Dispatches. 1998. Ofsted.
London: Channel 4, March 19 [video: VHS].
|
The Learning Curve. 2005.
Music education and the music manifesto. London: BBC
Radio 4, July 12 [audio recording: MP3].
|
In the case
of videos, films or DVDs, follow the same order as above including
directors’ names but starting with the film title:
Title. (in italics)
Year. (for films the preferred date is the year of release in the country
of production)
Director. (note the name is not written with family name first)
Place of production:
Organisation responsible for production
medium:format [In square brackets].
Donnie Darko. 2004.
Directed by Richard Kelly. New York: Pandora [DVD].
|
In the case of leaflets,
the author is often the organisation publishing the leaflet. Sometimes items
do not have a date of publication. In this case, use any of the following
terms ‘undated’, ‘no date’ or ‘n.d.’ in brackets. You should demonstrate
that you have checked the date and not just forgotten it (see also section
4.4):
Cancerlink. [no date]
Declaration of rights of people with Cancer. London:
Cancerlink.
|
Electronic resources can be
referenced giving similar details to those for printed material. You also
need to include the date when you accessed the resource, as well as the full
web site address. This address or URL (Uniform Resource Locator) is the
equivalent of the place and publisher.
When you cite Internet
addresses, punctuation is particularly important. Use the common convention
of using chevrons (< >) to delineate the start and end of an address. The
chevron is not part of the Internet address.
Include the following
information in this order:
Author/Editor.
Year.
Document title. (in italics)
edition. (if not first edition)
Type of medium [in square brackets]
Place of publication (if available):
Publisher (if available)
The words Available
from: followed by the web address <in chevrons>
Date accessed in square brackets.
Improvement and Development
Agency. 1999. Local Agenda 21 UK: what’s new?
[online] Available from: <http://www.scream.co.uk/la21/>
[Accessed March 3 2000].
|
Author/Editor.
Year.
Document title. (in italics)
edition. (if not first edition)
Type of medium [in square brackets]
Place of publication (if available):
Publisher (if available)
The words Available
from: followed by the web address <in chevrons>
Date accessed in square brackets.
Mandelstam, M. 2005.
Community care practice and the law. 3rd ed.
[electronic book] London: Jessica Kingsley. Available from:
<http://cite.ebrary.com/lib/qmu/> [Accessed February 28
2006].
|
Include the following information in this order.
Author/Editor.
Year.
Title of article.
Name of journal (in italics)
Type of medium [in square brackets]
Volume (issue number) month/season (if available),
page number(s) or online equivalent.
The words Available from: followed by the Internet address <in chevrons>
Date accessed in square brackets.
Cotter, J. 1999. Asset
revelations and debt contracting. Abacus [online] 35
(5) October, pp.268-285. Available from: <http://www.ingenta.com>
[Accessed November 19 2001].
|
Sometimes you may need to
reference a whole web site, in which case you follow the same pattern as
above:
British Broadcasting
Corporation. 2005. The BBC home page. [online]
Available from: <http://www.bbc.co.uk> [Accessed June 14
2005].
|
Visual information such as pictures,
photographs, cartoons and illustrations should always be acknowledged, even
if they are free clip-art. When a website specifically requests that you
cite extra information as a condition of using their site do so because this
will ensure providers will continue to offer such resources freely. Include
the following information:
Title of image, or a description. (in italics)
Year.
The words ‘online image’ or ‘online video’ [in square brackets]
The words ‘Available from’: followed by <the Internet address>
Filename including extension
Date accessed in square brackets.
Boy with spiky hair sitting
in bathtub. 2005. [online image] Available from:
<http://www.inmagine.com/all-kids,-all-fun-photos/photodisc-pdv205>
pdv205.jpg [Accessed July 15 2005].
|
Discussion lists should
include the following information:
Author.
Year.
Title of message.
Discussion list name, month
and day. (in italics)
The word online [in square
brackets]
The words ‘Available from’:
E-mail list address or <URL>
Date accessed in square
brackets.
Dahal, R. M. 2005. Assistive
Technology Conference - Balancing the Equation. Lis-link,
April 4. [online] Available from: <http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
> [Accessed July 27 2005].
|
Referencing personal
emails may occasionally be required, especially if you are involved in group
work, or are corresponding with a subject expert. You should include the
following information in this order:
Author / Sender.
Sender’s email address (in brackets)
Year.
Subject of email. (in italics)
Month and day.
Email to: recipients name (email address).
Cormie, V. (v.cormie@aol.com)
2005. Make poverty history. July 2. Email to:
Tony Blair (tony@gov.uk).
|
Laurillard, D. (d.laurillard@ou.ac.uk) 2005.
Re. Learning Styles Dissertation. August 4. Email to: Susi
Peacock (speacock@qmu.ac.uk).
Research always takes more
time than you will expect. Making use of library catalogues, bibliographies,
indexes and abstracts will help you to find details of books and articles.
Be warned that checking details after you have written your assignment is
time consuming and difficult. It is far better if you keep a record of your
references as you conduct your research. Remember to:
- keep a careful and accurate note of
all your sources as you prepare your assignment
- make a note of all the document
details for future reference
- make sure you have all the details
you need before you photocopy anything
- make sure you are following the
referencing guidelines set by your programme.
In the reference list, in
order to maintain consistency, you use only the initial letter of the
author’s given name rather than including the full name. If you do not wish
to obscure the gender of the research base, it is possible to refer within
your text to the author’s full name:
A recent study by Carol Smith
(Smith 1990) revealed that blue eyes were more common than
brown eyes in the U.K. However the findings were challenged
in a study funded by the Ophthalmic Lens Association (Jones
2005) . . .
|
If the source does not have
an author or organisation, list alphabetically by the title. Include the
whole title and ignore words such as: ‘a’; ‘an’; ‘the’; at the beginning of
the reference title. Any reference starting with a number precedes the
alphabetical list; if there is more than one, they are organised
numerically:
The 2001 Census: measuring
democracy in the United Kingdom. London: Bacoprint,
2001.
|
This example would appear at the beginning of the alphabetical list of
references as the first word is a number and because the word ‘the’ is
ignored. See example reference list in section 5.
Note that sometimes sources
do not have a date of publication. In this case, use any of the following
terms but be consistent: (undated); (no date) or (n.d.) in brackets. This
demonstrates that you have checked the date and not just forgotten it. If
there are any clues which might help you to place the date within a
particular decade (198?), then do so as this is considered better than no
date. Searching for the most recent dates referred to in the text or the
references of the publication will help. See also 3.12.
The omission of a word,
phrase, line, paragraph, or more from a quoted passage is indicated by three
spaced dots or ellipsis points. The quotation must maintain the same
sense as the original: